Leadership is not a position—it is the condition that makes school improvement possible

Just a few weeks ago, during a leadership session at a Regional Educational Service Agency (RESA) in Georgia, I asked leaders from multiple school districts to complete a simple exercise.

I displayed a blank two-column table on the screen. In the left column, I asked participants to list every major initiative their teachers were expected to implement during the coming school year. In the right column, I asked them to list every data point their district expected educators to collect, analyze, or report. For several minutes, the room was filled only with the sound of keyboards clicking and pens moving across paper.

When we began sharing responses, one district leader volunteered to walk us through their list. The left column contained more than fifteen separate initiatives and included everything from literacy and mathematics initiatives to MTSS, behavior systems, PLC expectations, instructional technology, attendance improvement efforts, and curriculum implementation. The right column was even longer: assessment results, benchmark data, attendance, behavior, walkthrough evidence, intervention data, survey results, progress monitoring, compliance reports, state accountability measures, and several others.

No one questioned whether these initiatives or data sources were valuable. Most existed for good reasons and were grounded in sound practice. But then I asked one simple question: “If you were a classroom teacher in this district, what would you believe matters most?”

The room became quiet.

Not because anyone lacked an answer, but because everyone recognized the same challenge. When educators are asked to do everything and monitor everything, clarity becomes one of the first casualties. Good initiatives begin competing with one another instead of reinforcing one another. Valuable data become reports to complete instead of information that drives better decisions.

Effective leadership is essential

Leadership is not measured by how many initiatives a school launches. It is measured by how clearly it helps people focus on what matters most.

My experience in Georgia reinforced one of the most important lessons I have learned about school improvement. Schools rarely struggle because educators lack commitment, talent, or passion. More often, improvement stalls because too many worthwhile priorities compete for the same finite time, energy, and attention.

This is precisely why effective leaders is one of the 5Essentials. Leadership is not simply about making decisions or managing operations. It is about creating the organizational conditions where teachers can focus on the work that matters most, students experience consistent, high-quality instruction, and improvement becomes sustainable rather than overwhelming.

Research from the University of Chicago Consortium on School Research consistently demonstrates that schools strong in the Five Essentials are far more likely to improve student outcomes over time. While each essential contributes to school success, effective leadership serves as the catalyst that connects them all. Without coherent leadership, collaboration becomes fragmented, instructional improvement loses momentum, and even the best initiatives struggle to produce lasting results.

Three practices that define effective leaders

The strongest leaders rarely have all the answers. Instead, they create coherence and develop the leadership capacity of everyone around them. They also stay the course and focus on the big picture, monitoring what matters most. All of this allows leaders to build a foundation of trust, which is critical for long-term success.

1. Effective leaders create coherence instead of adding more

One of the greatest challenges facing schools today is initiative overload. New programs, mandates, technologies, assessments, and expectations continually arrive, each promising to improve outcomes. Yet every additional initiative competes for educators’ limited time and attention.

Effective leaders resist the temptation to continually add. Instead, they organize.

Rather than asking, “What should we do next?” they ask, “How does this connect to what we already believe and are already doing?”

Coherent schools develop shared priorities that everyone understands. Professional learning aligns with instructional expectations. Data meetings reinforce instructional goals. Evaluation supports professional growth. Resources are intentionally directed toward a common vision. Instead of operating as isolated systems, every process reinforces the same destination.

Teachers thrive when expectations are consistent rather than constantly changing. Because when everything is important, nothing feels important.

2. Effective leaders build leadership throughout the organization

School improvement cannot depend upon one principal or one district leader. Sustainable improvement occurs when leadership becomes a shared responsibility rather than an individual role.

The highest-performing schools intentionally develop teacher leaders, instructional coaches, department chairs, grade-level facilitators, and aspiring administrators. Leadership becomes distributed—not because responsibility is delegated away, but because expertise is intentionally cultivated throughout the organization.

When leadership is shared, problems are solved closer to where they occur, innovation spreads more quickly, teachers develop greater ownership, and improvement continues even during leadership transitions.

Building leadership capacity requires far more than assigning responsibilities. It requires coaching, feedback, trust, and opportunities for educators to make meaningful decisions that influence teaching and learning. The goal is not simply to create followers who implement well. The goal is to develop leaders who improve the work of others.

3. Effective leaders monitor what matters

Schools measure many things. Effective leaders ensure they are measuring the right things.

Rather than focusing exclusively on end-of-year outcomes, they pay close attention to the leading indicators that predict future success. They ask questions such as “Are students engaged in meaningful learning?” “Are classrooms reflecting our instructional expectations?” “Are collaborative teams using evidence to improve instruction?” “Are interventions occurring as intended?” “Are staff members receiving timely, actionable feedback?”

These questions shift monitoring from accountability to improvement. Data should create conversations, not simply fill spreadsheets.

When leaders consistently observe, reflect, celebrate progress, and adjust support, improvement becomes continuous instead of reactive. Monitoring is not about catching people doing something wrong; it is about learning whether the systems adults have designed are producing the experiences students deserve.

Leadership shapes every other essential

Supportive environments, the 5Essentials condition I explored in “Before students can achieve, they must belong: 3 tips for building supportive environments,” do not happen by accident. Collaborative teachers do not emerge without intentional structures. Ambitious instruction requires professional learning, coaching, and trust. Strong family and community partnerships require consistent communication and authentic relationships.

Every one of these essentials depends upon leadership that creates the conditions for success.

Leadership is less about being the person with the vision and more about ensuring everyone understands how their daily work contributes to that vision. When leaders create coherence, teachers gain confidence. When teachers gain confidence, instructional quality improves. When instructional quality improves, students benefit.

That is the power of effective leadership.

Five questions leaders can ask themselves tomorrow

Tomorrow morning, school and district leaders can begin strengthening their leadership by asking themselves five simple questions:

  • Which initiatives can we better align instead of continuing to add?
  • What data do we collect that no longer informs better decisions?
  • Who on our staff is ready for greater leadership responsibility?
  • What evidence tells us our instructional expectations are actually happening in classrooms?
  • If I asked every teacher to name our three highest priorities, would they all give the same answer?

The answers to those questions may reveal more about the health of a school or district than any accountability report ever could.

Change starts with you

The most effective leaders understand that lasting school improvement is not built through heroic leadership. It is built through intentional leadership that develops people, creates coherence, and relentlessly focuses the organization on what matters most.

Because leadership is not about helping people do more; it is about making the most important work impossible to ignore.

Website

The Center for Model Schools

For more than 30 years, the Center for Model Schools, formerly ICLE, has partnered with districts and schools to ensure every student is in the model school they deserve. Leveraging the research-backed 5Essentials® framework, we prioritize actionable leadership strategies that transform school culture.

Read more

White paper

Why research and innovation can improve outcomes

Making sound, student-focused decisions amid constant change can feel impossible. Partnering with a research-based assessment provider can help.

Read more

Article

Address opportunity gaps

MAP® Growth™ can help teachers understand where students are in their learning journey and help close gaps in learning.

Read more

Content disclaimer:

Teach. Learn. Grow. includes diverse perspectives that are meant to be a resource to educators and leaders across the country and around the world. The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of NWEA.